New Relativity: A Unified Theory of the Organization of Matter and Energy in the Universe
Questioning Einstein's Fundamental Equation and Proposing an Alternative Framework for Understanding Energy, Matter, and the Universe
Einstein's theory of relativity makes a critical incorrect assumption, with rippling effects across all scientific disciplines. He fails to recognize that the superscript “²” implies a numerical relationship, which requires an automatic or instinctual understanding of that relationship—i.e., an interpreter to insert the correct effect of that function. This significantly impacts our basic understanding of thermodynamics.
No fundamental theorem of the universe can ever leave any of its components up to interpretation. It must contain universal absolutes and define their relationships to one another in order to be free of confounding qualifiers based on human interpretation.
I therefore posit:
E does not equal MC², because it includes a confounding operation. There must be another relationship between these variables that can be performed in such a way as to comply with the definition of a universal law.
If light itself is taken to be its own unique, unit-less force, we cannot apply Newtonian physical properties to it, such as speed or acceleration.
Therefore, we can simplify it to E = Light, because light times light is meaningless, as is light times mass—because I have never seen the Bat Signal push the Earth, let alone a cloud, away. Instead of E = MC², it should be:
L = Matter
If that is true, we would have only light and matter in the universe, and no motion would occur, which begs the question: what is motion? It may be a fundamental property of the universe, or it may merely be a relationship between light and matter. In our human experience, motion is the change in the relative positions of objects to one another over time, which could introduce time as another variable. However, we need to keep things in absolute terms. Therefore, in its most abstract form, motion must remain a relative value or ratio, such as the ratio of light to matter:
Motion = Light : Matter
The word motion does not encapsulate all of the complex interactions in the universe. Therefore, we can move further into an abstract or absolute definition and use the word change.
Δ = Matter : Light
Or:
Δ = Matter : Light
Therefore, light is the ratio of matter to change, or, even more interestingly:
Light × Δ = Matter
This could imply that all matter is secondary to the decay of light as it extends from its point of origin. The products of this decay could include matter, electromagnetic radiation, and heat. It may be more correct, then, to describe light as energy in its absolute form, as represented in the derivative of Einstein’s equation above. Therefore:
Energy = Light
Which means:
E × Δ = Matter
Another expression of this relationship is:
Δ × Matter = E
This makes sense on Earth—such as when a change in heat is applied to paper, causing combustion—but how does this work on a cosmic scale? It could mean that there truly is a central point of origin of all light and matter in the universe, and that potential energy is gained as the products of an initial event lose energy and gain mass while radiating outward in every direction.
Initial products would coalesce and begin creating more complex celestial bodies, eventually condensing into a massive star and a subsequent black hole that could counter the force of escaping light and create a harmonious bubble of spacetime, or “event horizon,” which we may now occupy. But how could the light sustain an effect on the products it left behind? It would not stand to reason that light would be tugging us with enough force to prevent universal collapse. There must be another force at play. This, I believe, is the next frontier of our understanding of matter. Below, I describe one possible implication of the information above.
In what should be a relatively predictable expansion and contraction of matter and light in the universe—a cascading, billiard-like reaction of all atoms—all motion would be absolutely predictable due to the complete organization of all matter condensed into a single point upon itself. The universe would never truly change; it would merely pulse. Every atom, and perhaps every subatomic particle, would have a predestined path through the universe. This could mean that even life has a predictable end, as the origination of all matter would be linked in an inescapable path back to its origin.
If a subatomic particle is most instrumental in determining a fixed path for matter, then matter that has become capable of volition or self-generated movement would alter the universe on a quantum scale. Humans may be the most active agents in this interruption of what could be described as a quantum meshwork. Deviation from—or alignment with—one’s quantum “skeleton” could explain many phenomena that have thus far gone unexplained, such as aging, the placebo effect, and disease. It may also explain many of the seemingly impossible descriptions of events found in history and religion.
P.S.
I’m an ophthalmologist.
